努比亚红魔 9 Pro 评测--速度惊人、设计时尚的游戏手机全速前进！ 努比亚的 RedMagic 系列是不折不扣的性能、吸引人的设计和实用游戏功能的代名词。RedMagic 9 Pro 同样秉承了这一理念，并再次内置了风扇。请阅读我们的评测，了解它是否值得升级。Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 02/07/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇸🇪 🇹🇷 🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇵🇱 5G Android Gaming Smartphone Touchscreen
Test device courtesy of Nubia RedMagic
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types ← exclude selected tags
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (RedMagic Series)ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, 1 x 3.3 GHz ARM Cortex-X4, 3 x 3.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A720, 2 x 3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A720, 2 x 2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A520, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)Graphics adapterQualcomm Adreno 750Memory16 GB , LPDDR5xDisplay6.80 inch 20:9, 2480 x 1116 pixel 400 PPI, Capacitive, BOE Q9+, AMOLED, 2160 Hz PWM dimming, Corning Gorilla Glass, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 HzStorage512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB , 487.39 GB freeConnections1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Audio jack (3.5 mm), USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, 520Hz touch sampling rate touchpads, OTG, Game Space Switch: Toggles special game mode on or offNetworkingWi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band C0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28A, 28B, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 163.98 x 76.35Battery6500 mAh Lithium-IonChargingfast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemAndroid 14CameraPrimary Camera: 50 MPix (Samsung GN5, 1/1.57", OIS) 50 MPix (Ultra Wide, Samsung JN1, f/2.2, 0.64 µm) 2 MPix (f/2.4); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.0)Additional featuresSpeakers: Dual, Keyboard: On-screen, 80W charger, clear case, USB Cable, SIM ejector tool, RedMagic OS 9.0, 12 Months Warranty, RGB light: fully customisable lighting effects; 20,000 RPM high-speed turbofan; DRM Widevine L1; GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a); HDR: HLG, HDR10; DRM Widevine L1, fanlessWeight229 g, Power Supply: 125 g
Price799 EuroNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
潜在的竞争对手比较
BewertungDatumModellGewichtLaufwerkGroesseAufloesungPreis ab
86.8 %v7 (old)02 / 2024Nubia RedMagic 9 ProSD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750229 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"2480x1116
88.3 %v7 (old)08 / 2023Nubia RedMagic 8S ProSD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740228 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"2480x1116
87.4 %v7 (old)01 / 2024Xiaomi Poco F5 ProSD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730204 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"3200x1440
88.6 %v7 (old)02 / 2024Asus ROG Phone 8 ProSD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750225 g1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"2400x1080
外壳和功能 - 无缝观看体验努比亚红魔 9 Pro 的外观棱角分明，让人想起前代产品的设计。该设备非常平衡，尽管相当重，但手感很好。它有 Sleet（黑色）、Cyclone（半透明背面）和 Snowfall（银白色）三种配色可供选择。
我们喜欢 9 Pro 的制造质量：手机上的所有缝隙都很小而且均匀。它再次采用了无缝显示屏，前置摄像头隐藏在面板下方。同时，显示屏下方的摄像头几乎看不见，只有在光线照射到显示屏的特定角度才能找到。后置摄像头与手机机身齐平--这在当今并不多见。它们同样被一块不明玻璃所覆盖。
这款游戏手机没有任何 IP 认证，但密封的 SIM 卡插槽表明至少有一些基本的防水溅保护。
在功能方面，这款手机与前代产品类似。在手机右侧，你会再次看到两个触摸式专用触发器。它们提供了良好的触觉反馈，在游戏过程中感觉非常灵敏。
集成的 USB 端口不仅能提供很高的数据传输速度（拷贝测试：635.9 MB/s），还支持通过线缆进行视频输出。这意味着您可以轻松镜像屏幕或加载桌面版 RedMagic Game Space（最高全高清和 144Hz）。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
尺寸比较
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro DIN A6 ❌
连接、软件和操作努比亚红魔 9 Pro 支持所有常规移动通信标准，频率覆盖范围广。通过 Wi-Fi 7 以及 5.0 GHz 和 6.0 GHz 两个频率范围，无线局域网连接非常迅速和稳定。
只要将手机贴在耳边，就能获得不错的语音质量。不过，噪音抑制效果一般，RedMagic 在扬声器模式下听起来略有回音。
操作系统方面，该手机配备了Android 14 和努比亚的 RedMagic OS 9.0 定制 UI。在审查时，安全补丁的日期是 2023 年 11 月 1 日，因此不再是完全最新的。根据经验，更新只会零星推出。努比亚只承诺提供一次重大更新和两年的安全补丁。
生物识别安全由显示屏内的光学指纹扫描仪处理，该扫描仪工作正常，还能测量心率。此外，您还可以通过前置摄像头进行面部识别，但这种方法的安全性较低。
除了两个额外的电容式肩部触发器外，边框上还有一个醒目的红色按钮，可以让你切换到手机上的特殊游戏界面：RedMagic Game Space。通过它，用户可以自定义各个游戏的设置，并管理任何配对的配件。
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
1801 (1553min - 1882max) MBit/s Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
1716 (1119min - 1807max) MBit/s -5%Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
979 (959min - 999max) MBit/s -46%Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
941 (475min - 989max) MBit/s -48% iperf3 receive AXE11000Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
1660 (1500min - 1710max) MBit/s Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
1573 (1358min - 1639max) MBit/s -5%Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
988 (487min - 993max) MBit/s -40%Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
815 (767min - 825max) MBit/s -51% iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHzXiaomi Poco F5 Pro
1738 (1597min - 1857max) MBit/s +1%Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
1734 (1577min - 1828max) MBit/s +1%Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
1716 (829min - 1880max) MBit/s Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
1639 (824min - 1697max) MBit/s -4% iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHzNubia RedMagic 8S Pro
1689 (1571min - 1722max) MBit/s +5%Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
1613 (654min - 1703max) MBit/s Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
1505 (659min - 1568max) MBit/s -7%Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
1153 (847min - 1341max) MBit/s -29%Legend
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1688 (829-1880) Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1734 (1577-1828) Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1588 (654-1703) Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1482 (659-1568) Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1657 (1500-1710) Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø814 (767-825) Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1801 (1553-1882) Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø925 (475-989)
摄像头：双摄像头更好，前置摄像头较弱使用 RedMagic 9 Pro 拍摄的自拍照前置摄像头没有什么变化。显示屏下方的摄像头具有美颜模式，但即使禁用该功能，图像看起来仍然浑浊且缺乏细节。在弱光环境下，照片的噪点也会很快变多。
现在的主摄像头模块比上一代产品少了一个镜头。广角传感器与 红魔 8S Pro但现在具有光学图像稳定（OIS）功能。第二个镜头也有 5000 万像素，可用于拍摄超广角和微距图像。虽然没有光学变焦，但该手机能够实现高达 10 倍的数码变焦。使用 RedMagic 9 Pro 拍摄的照片具有不错的细节，但看起来有些冲淡和暗淡。
主摄像头可以录制高达 8K（30 帧/秒）的视频，前置摄像头可以录制全高清（30 帧/秒）视频。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow-lightclick to load imagesNubia RedMagic 9 ProGoogle Pixel 8Honor Magic5 ProCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesNubia RedMagic 9 ProGoogle Pixel 8Honor Magic5 ProCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesNubia RedMagic 9 ProGoogle Pixel 8Honor Magic5 ProCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesNubia RedMagic 9 ProGoogle Pixel 8Honor Magic5 ProCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesNubia RedMagic 9 ProGoogle Pixel 8Honor Magic5 ProCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
11.4 ∆E6 ∆E5.4 ∆E6.5 ∆E5.6 ∆E6.7 ∆E8.3 ∆E10.4 ∆E7.7 ∆E4.9 ∆E2.7 ∆E5.1 ∆E11.6 ∆E9.3 ∆E9 ∆E4.4 ∆E5 ∆E7.4 ∆E7.3 ∆E1.2 ∆E3.9 ∆E2.2 ∆E4 ∆E8 ∆EColorChecker Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro: 6.42 ∆E min: 1.2 - max: 11.56 ∆E27.7 ∆E46.9 ∆E35.5 ∆E33.4 ∆E39.3 ∆E54.3 ∆E45.8 ∆E29.8 ∆E33.5 ∆E26.2 ∆E56.2 ∆E56.2 ∆E26.5 ∆E43 ∆E29 ∆E64.3 ∆E35.5 ∆E38.8 ∆E68.9 ∆E64.5 ∆E48.5 ∆E35 ∆E22.8 ∆E12.9 ∆EColorChecker Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro: 40.61 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 68.94 ∆E
Nubia RedMagic 9 ProNubia RedMagic 9 Pro
显示屏 - RedMagic 9 Pro 采用明亮的 AMOLED 显示屏子像素结构就一般规格而言，RedMagic 9 Pro 的显示屏与上一代产品相比没有变化：它是一块 6.8 英寸全高清+面板，刷新率高达 120Hz。不过，色彩准确度和亮度得到了进一步提高。
在启用环境光传感器后，AMOLED 显示屏的平均峰值亮度达到 1,031 cd/m²，同时显示完全白色的图像。当亮区和暗区均匀分布时（APL 18），面板亮度甚至达到了 1,242 cd/m²。在播放 HDR 时也达到了类似的水平。显示屏的手动最大亮度为 589 cd/m²。
与所有 OLED 面板一样，RedMagic 9 Pro 的屏幕也无法避免闪烁现象。不过，努比亚采用了 2160Hz 的高频 PWM 调光技术，使显示屏尽可能舒适。
1012cd/m²1023cd/m²1048cd/m²1017cd/m²1035cd/m²1054cd/m²1011cd/m²1036cd/m²1042cd/m²
Distribution of brightnessBOE Q9+ tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 1054 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1030.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3.32 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 96 %Center on Battery: 1035 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.76}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.25CCT: 6368 K
Nubia RedMagic 9 ProBOE Q9+, AMOLED, 2480x1116, 6.8"Nubia RedMagic 8S ProAMOLED, 2480x1116, 6.8"Xiaomi Poco F5 ProAMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"Asus ROG Phone 8 ProOLED, 2400x1080, 6.8"Response Times-116%-21%-27% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)0.8 ?(0.4015, 0.401)2.06 ?(1.027, 1.03) -158%1.09 ?(0.527, 0.5615) -36%1.18 ?(0.5235, 0.655) -48% Response Time Black / White * (ms)1.08 ?(0.539, 0.5365)1.88 ?(1.065, 0.819) -74%1.13 ?(0.569, 0.559) -5%1.14 ?(0.6525, 0.483) -6% PWM Frequency (Hz)6060120.3485Screen-21%6%-30%Brightness middle (cd/m²)1035775 -25%1002 -3%1699 64%Brightness (cd/m²)1031778 -25%1004 -3%1698 65%Brightness Distribution (%)9698 2%95 -1%98 2%Black Level * (cd/m²)Colorchecker dE 2000 *11.3 -30%0.8 20%1.9 -90%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *1.92.4 -26%1.7 11%4.7 -147%Greyscale dE 2000 *1.61.9 -19%1.4 13%2.8 -75%Gamma2.25 98%2.28 96%2.23 99%2.26 97%CCT6368 102%6693 97%6468 100%6648 98%Total Average (Program / Settings)-69% /
-44%-8% /
-1%-29% /
-29%* ... smaller is better
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White1.08 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.539 ms rise↘ 0.5365 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4015 ms rise↘ 0.401 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.4 ms).
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 HzThe display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .
The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8016 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
分钟
25%
50%
75 %
100 %灰度（色彩模式：标准，色温：正常，目标色域：DCI-P3）
ColorChecker（色彩模式：标准，色温：正常，目标色域：DCI-P3）
色彩空间（色彩模式：标准，色温：正常，目标色域：DCI-P3）
饱和度（色彩模式：标准，色温：正常，目标色域：DCI-P3）RedMagic 9 Pro 户外版
RedMagic 9 Pro 的视角性能、排放和电池寿命努比亚红魔 9 Pro 是全球首批搭载 高通骁龙 8 代 3.内置风扇的运行噪音（最大 39 dB(A)）甚至低于 8S Pro。 8S Pro内置风扇的运行噪音比 8S Pro 更低（最大 39 分贝（A）），使手机能够在大部分时间内保持处理器在峰值性能下稳定运行。
在浏览器基准测试中，我们注意到 RedMagic 手机和 Chrome 浏览器的配合并不默契。在使用谷歌浏览器时，结果出奇的差。而当我们使用微软 Edge 浏览器时，情况就不同了。
我们运行了 Burnout 基准测试（CPU + GPU）来模拟高负荷运行。大约十分钟后，RedMagic 9 Pro 就崩溃了，需要重新启动。尽管有风扇，但设备还是过热了。因此，在仅启用 CPU 负载的情况下进行了后续测量。即便如此，游戏手机还是变得非常热。
RedMagic 9 Pro 的两个扬声器音量非常大，但在中等音量下听起来已经很刺耳和空洞。
努比亚手机真正的亮点在于电池续航时间。它的电池容量高达 6,500 毫安时，在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中可以持续使用 17 个小时。
Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.5 | PCMark for Android | Antutu v10 | 3DMark | GFXBench | Octane V2 Geekbench 5.5
Single-CoreXiaomi 14 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1687 Points +7%Asus ROG Phone 8 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
1672 Points +6%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (1343 - 1702, n=17)
1651 Points +5%Nubia RedMagic 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1575 Points Nubia RedMagic 8S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1574 Points 0%Xiaomi Poco F5 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1266 Points -20%Average of class Smartphone (145 - 2635, n=110, last 2 years)
1199 Points -24% Multi-CoreXiaomi 14 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6439 Points +19%Asus ROG Phone 8 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
6415 Points +19%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (5393 - 6543, n=17)
6007 Points +11%Nubia RedMagic 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
5393 Points Nubia RedMagic 8S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5129 Points -5%Average of class Smartphone (550 - 9512, n=110, last 2 years)
4174 Points -23%Xiaomi Poco F5 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3965 Points -26%Geekbench 6.5
Single-CoreAsus ROG Phone 8 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
2318 Points +2%Asus ROG Phone 8 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
2258 Points -1%Xiaomi 14 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2278 Points 0%Nubia RedMagic 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2270 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (954 - 2329, n=29)
2115 Points -7%Nubia RedMagic 8S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
2104 Points -7%Xiaomi Poco F5 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1741 Points -23%Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=209, last 2 years)
1727 Points -24% Multi-CoreAsus ROG Phone 8 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
7357 Points +3%Asus ROG Phone 8 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
7193 Points +1%Nubia RedMagic 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
7151 Points Xiaomi 14 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6875 Points -4%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4564 - 7501, n=29)
6608 Points -8%Nubia RedMagic 8S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5648 Points -21%Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11634, n=209, last 2 years)
5083 Points -29%Xiaomi Poco F5 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4346 Points -39%PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Asus ROG Phone 8 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
21385 Points +2%Nubia RedMagic 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
20943 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (12156 - 25683, n=28)
18063 Points -14%Nubia RedMagic 8S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
17399 Points -17%Xiaomi 14 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
15876 Points -24%Xiaomi Poco F5 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
15774 Points -25%Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=181, last 2 years)
14800 Points -29%Antutu v10 - Total Score
Asus ROG Phone 8 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
2162423 Points 0%Nubia RedMagic 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2157865 Points Xiaomi 14 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1905751 Points -12%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (1390723 - 2162423, n=24)
1903138 Points -12%Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3269237, n=138, last 2 years)
1480764 Points -31%Xiaomi Poco F5 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1308217 Points -39%3DMark
Wild Life Unlimited ScoreAsus ROG Phone 8 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
19690 Points +1%Nubia RedMagic 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
19566 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (15108 - 20321, n=23)
18652 Points -5%Nubia RedMagic 8S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
14737 Points -25%Average of class Smartphone (271 - 30621, n=191, last 2 years)
11150 Points -43%Xiaomi Poco F5 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8294 Points -58% Wild Life ExtremeAsus ROG Phone 8 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
5226 Points +2%Nubia RedMagic 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
5143 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (3967 - 5338, n=26)
4836 Points -6%Nubia RedMagic 8S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
3935 Points -23%Average of class Smartphone (61 - 8140, n=193, last 2 years)
2934 Points -43%Xiaomi Poco F5 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2121 Points -59% Wild Life Extreme UnlimitedAsus ROG Phone 8 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
5185 Points +1%Nubia RedMagic 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
5150 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (3991 - 5190, n=25)
4769 Points -7%Nubia RedMagic 8S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
3900 Points -24%Average of class Smartphone (62 - 8102, n=192, last 2 years)
2918 Points -43%Xiaomi Poco F5 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2079 Points -60% Solar Bay ScoreAverage of class Smartphone (3223 - 14869, n=82, last 2 years)
9368 Points +8%Asus ROG Phone 8 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
8655 Points 0%Nubia RedMagic 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
8648 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4769 - 8791, n=26)
8044 Points -7%Nubia RedMagic 8S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5700 Points -34% Solar Bay Unlimited ScoreAverage of class Smartphone (1151 - 15420, n=82, last 2 years)
9334 Points +8%Asus ROG Phone 8 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
8672 Points 0%Nubia RedMagic 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
8668 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4808 - 9262, n=25)
8057 Points -7%Nubia RedMagic 8S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5669 Points -35%GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier OnscreenXiaomi 14 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
109 fps +82%Xiaomi Poco F5 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
101 fps +68%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (50 - 122, n=26)
87.3 fps +45%Asus ROG Phone 8 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
61 fps +2%Nubia RedMagic 8S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
60 fps 0%Nubia RedMagic 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
60 fps Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 166, n=206, last 2 years)
59 fps -2%1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier OffscreenXiaomi 14 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
209 fps +29%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (92 - 241, n=27)
188.4 fps +16%Asus ROG Phone 8 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
183 fps +13%Nubia RedMagic 8S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
165 fps +2%Nubia RedMagic 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
162 fps Xiaomi Poco F5 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
126 fps -22%Average of class Smartphone (3.4 - 367, n=206, last 2 years)
116.7 fps -28%on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier OnscreenXiaomi 14 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
76 fps +27%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (42 - 119, n=26)
69.3 fps +16%Xiaomi Poco F5 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
63 fps +5%Asus ROG Phone 8 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
61 fps +2%Nubia RedMagic 8S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
60 fps 0%Nubia RedMagic 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
60 fps Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years)
47.3 fps -21%2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier OffscreenXiaomi 14 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
85 fps +33%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (43 - 96, n=28)
76 fps +19%Nubia RedMagic 8S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
72 fps +13%Asus ROG Phone 8 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
68 fps +6%Nubia RedMagic 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
64 fps Xiaomi Poco F5 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
48 fps -25%Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 146, n=206, last 2 years)
44.9 fps -30%3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier OffscreenXiaomi 14 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 (vulkan 1.0)
39 fps +3%Nubia RedMagic 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
38 fps Asus ROG Phone 8 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576
37 fps -3%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (30 - 42, n=27)
36 fps -5%Nubia RedMagic 8S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
33 fps -13%Xiaomi Poco F5 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
22 fps -42%Average of class Smartphone (0.54 - 62, n=207, last 2 years)
20.8 fps -45%Octane V2 - Total Score
Nubia RedMagic 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 (Edge 120)
70135 Points Nubia RedMagic 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 (Chrome 120)
25953 Points -63%Asus ROG Phone 8 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 (Edge 121.0.2277.84)
63669 Points -9%Xiaomi Poco F5 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 (Chrome 120.0.6099.115)
55611 Points -21%Xiaomi 14 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 (Chrome 120)
54365 Points -22%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (25953 - 75238, n=27)
54099 Points -23%Nubia RedMagic 8S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 (Edge 115)
52492 Points -25%Nubia RedMagic 8S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 (Chrome 115)
19870 Points -72%Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 126661, n=188, last 2 years)
48415 Points -31%
Basemark GPUScore
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø58.9 (15.2-100.4) Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø71.5 (17.9-136.2) Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø13.9 (9.4-22) Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø16.9 (10.9-48.7)
Nubia RedMagic 9 ProNubia RedMagic 8S ProXiaomi Poco F5 ProAsus ROG Phone 8 ProAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class SmartphoneAndroBench 3-5-19%-42%-3%-15%-44% Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)4164.083576.35 -14%1876.8 -55%4016.67 -4%3709 ?(1851 - 4512, n=51) -11%2152 ?(270 - 4370, n=197, last 2 years) -48% Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)3199.982682.03 -16%1773.94 -45%3153.4 -1%3123 ?(1494 - 4051, n=51) -2%1841 ?(103.2 - 4051, n=197, last 2 years) -42% Random Read 4KB (MB/s)442.82369.76 -16%342.04 -23%434.63 -2%383 ?(204 - 512, n=51) -14%293 ?(47.6 - 576, n=197, last 2 years) -34% Random Write 4KB (MB/s)691.17479.52 -31%372.35 -46%648 -6%479 ?(45.7 - 987, n=51) -31%342 ?(9.4 - 987, n=197, last 2 years) -51%
温度
Max. LoadIdle
54.7 °C54.2 °C51.1 °C 55 °C55.1 °C52.2 °C 54.7 °C53.9 °C53.3 °C
Maximum: 55.1 °CAverage: 53.8 °C
45 °C50 °C49.1 °C47.7 °C48.5 °C41.6 °C48.3 °C50.4 °C51.6 °C
Maximum: 51.6 °CAverage: 48 °C Power Supply (max.) 26.9 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle
24.7 °C24.1 °C24.9 °C 24.6 °C24.7 °C24.3 °C 24.3 °C24.8 °C24.5 °C
Maximum: 24.9 °CAverage: 24.5 °C
23.9 °C24.5 °C24.2 °C23.9 °C24.1 °C24.3 °C23.9 °C24.1 °C24.3 °C
Maximum: 24.5 °CAverage: 24.1 °C Power Supply (max.) 22.1 °C | Room Temperature 20.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 53.8 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55.1 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.6 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø30.2 (29.2-31) Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø29.5 (28.4-31.3) Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø26.9 (24.5-31) Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø109.7 (102.5-112.2) Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø105.8 (103.3-111.5) Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø96.1 (86.1-111.7) Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø117.1 (117-117.1) Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø28.8 (28.8-28.9) Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø26.6 (24.1-28.9) Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø29.2 (29.1-29.2) Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø26.7 (24.3-29.1)
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.7 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)Compared to same class» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 28% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 65% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.2 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)Compared to same class» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Average of class Smartphone (12.1 - 54.1, n=207, last 2 years)
19.7 h +14%Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro6500 mAh
17.3 h Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro6000 mAh
17.1 h -1%Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro5160 mAh
16 h -8%Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro5500 mAh
15.5 h -10%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 120)
17h 16min
Pros+ 明亮、精确、快速的显示
+ 高性能
+ 附加触摸传感器
+ 电池寿命长Cons- 温度会很高
- 更新支持期短
- 无 IP 认证
- 无无线充电功能
判决评测努比亚红魔9 Pro。评测机由努比亚友情提供。努比亚红魔 9 Pro 与前代产品 8S Pro 相比略有进步。 8S Pro.可配置的 LED 灯和额外的肩部按键等熟悉的亮点再次登场，且基本保持不变。除了采用最新的高通 SoC 外，这款游戏手机还提供了更亮的显示屏、更安静的风扇和更大的电池。新的摄像头设置也得到了改进。此外，这款手机现在的充电功率可达 80 瓦。
RedMagic 9 Pro 是一款功能强大、价格便宜的游戏手机。但它会变得非常热。
虽然风扇现在能更安静地运转是件好事，但在我们的压力测试中，散热解决方案还不足以防止手机关机。努比亚最好能稍微降低 SoC 的运行速度，而不是一味追求高性能。虽然游戏时过热不是问题，但表面温度可能会很高。
此外，该机还缺少一些功能，如无线充电和 IP 认证，鉴于产品的重点，这两项功能都可以忽略不计。不过，这个价位的设备应该支持 eSIM 卡。
华硕 ROG Phone 8 Pro 是 RedMagic 9 Pro 最强劲的竞争对手。如果你主要关注的是性能，其他高端智能手机可能同样是你的不错选择，尤其是努比亚 Z60 Ultra。
价格和供应情况努比亚红魔 9 Pro 有三种配置可供选择：
颜色
内存/存储
价格 (RRP)
Sleet
12/256 GB
649 欧元/649 美元
旋风
16/512 GB
€799/US$799
Snowfall
16/512 GB
€799/US$799
所有型号均可直接从制造商网站订购或亚马逊网站订购。
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
- 02/05/2024 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Chassis83%
Keyboard67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device93%
Connectivity64 / 70 → 92%
Weight88%
Battery92%
Display93%
Games Performance81 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance96 / 86 → 100%
Temperature37%
Noise70%
Audio78 / 90 → 87%
Average79%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
More articles related to this deviceNubia RedMagic 9 Pro (RedMagic Series)Review•游戏力量无处不在--努比亚 RedMagic Astra 游... |Review•努比亚红魔 8S Pro 评测--游戏智能手机的风扇控制更出色 |Review•努比亚RedMagic 8 Pro评测--具有100%性能的... |Review•努比亚RedMagic 7S Pro评测--集成风扇和UDC... |Review•努比亚RedMagic 7评测--带有165赫兹AMOLED... |Review•努比亚RedMagic 6S Pro评测--具有集成风扇和1... |Review•努比亚RedMagic 6R智能手机评测--144赫兹的游戏...
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
Please share our article, every link counts!
Editor of the original article: Zhiwei Zhuang - Translator - 577 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 711034 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via: